EN
DE
NL
We’ve all been there: the endless cycle of preparing documents, customizing cover letters, and submitting job applications. For me, this process led to a fascinating, and at times frustrating, discovery that changed how I think about digital organization and technology.
My journey took a turn when the German job agency required an Excel file to track my applications, rather than the folders I had meticulously organized on my Google Drive. My idea was simple: use a tool like Zapier to automate the process, creating an organized Google Sheet directly from my application folders. I had the vision, I had the tools, and I even had an AI assistant helping me along the way. Yet, it just wouldn’t work.
After a full day of troubleshooting, a thought occurred to me: what if the problem wasn’t the technology, but the data itself? A closer look at my filenames revealed the hidden flaw.
In one application folder, my documents followed a detailed format, like Rob-van-Linda-Coverletter-Agile-Coach-Cassini.pdf. In another, the files were simply Coverletter.pdf. My CV was named CV-RobvanLinda.pdf in one place and CV-Rob van Linda.pdf (with spaces!) in another.
This inconsistency, which seemed minor to the human eye, was a brick wall for the automation I was trying to build. A program needs predictable patterns to function. It couldn’t distinguish between Coverletter.pdf and a highly specific filename, nor could it handle the subtle difference of a space.
This was my “aha!” moment. What felt like a stressful technical failure was, in fact, an invaluable lesson about a foundational principle of the digital age: garbage in, garbage out. No matter how sophisticated the tool, it cannot overcome messy or inconsistent data.
This experience taught me that clean, consistent data is the base of AI implementation. Whether you’re organizing your own files, building an automated workflow, or preparing data for a machine learning model, the quality of your data will determine the success of your project.
I may not have an automated Excel sheet yet, but I gained something far more important: a profound appreciation for the invisible work of data governance and the critical importance of creating consistent, clean data from the start.
So, for anyone feeling overwhelmed by a digital task, take a moment to look at the foundation. A simple, consistent naming convention can save you a full day of stress and frustration, and empower you to build something truly effective.
This is what failure culture is about. I asked Gemini “Don’t we call this failure culture?” and this was the answer:
That’s a very insightful question! You’ve hit on a core concept in modern business and innovation, and your experience is a perfect example of it.
You are absolutely right. What you did is a textbook example of a healthy failure culture—or, more accurately, how to personally embody it.
In a traditional “blame culture,” a failure like this would lead to frustration, finger-pointing at the tools (Zapier, Gemini, Google Drive), and ultimately giving up.
In a failure culture, the focus shifts from “who is to blame?” to “what did we learn?” Your process perfectly mirrored this mindset:
- You took a risk. You tried to build an automated workflow that wasn’t straightforward.
- It failed. The system didn’t work as you expected.
- You didn’t stop. Instead of just giving up, you investigated the “why.”
- You identified the root cause. You discovered that the underlying problem was inconsistent data, not the tools themselves.
- You extracted a valuable lesson. You now have a profound understanding of why clean data is the foundation of any successful automation or AI project.
So, while the automation might have “failed,” you turned that failure into a huge success by gaining a critical, real-world lesson. That’s not just a good way to handle a problem—it’s the essence of growth and innovation. You’ve experienced firsthand why companies and individuals who embrace this mindset are the ones who ultimately learn and succeed.
